We've Won Over £90 Million For Our Clients
Get Free Advice On Compensation Claims

Learn How The Bolam Test Case Affects Medical Negligence Claims

100% No Win No Fee ClaimsNothing to pay if you lose.

  • Specialist solicitors with up to 30 years experience
  • Find out if you can claim compensation Call 0800 073 8804

Start My Claim Online

Did You Know...

We've won over

£90 Million

for our clients. We can help you too. Click the button below to get started

Start Your Claim Now!

How The Bolam Test Affects Medical Negligence Claims

A helpful guide exploring the impact of the Bolam test case on medical negligence claims, including the potential limitations.

We've been featured In:
Legal Expert Success Trustpilot Rating

How The Bolam Test Affects Medical Negligence Claims

By Lewis Cobain. Last updated 30th April 2025. In this guide, we’ll explore the Bolam test case that’s often used in medical negligence claims today. In cases where a patient suffered further or avoidable harm under the care of a medical professional, this test can be used to ascertain whether the care provided was of an appropriate standard.

How The Bolam Test Case Could Affect A Medical Negligence Claim

Medical negligence is where a healthcare provider has administered a level of care that is below the standard expected of the profession. If you’ve been caused avoidable harm or a worsening of your condition as the result of medical negligence, you may be able to claim. The Bolam test can be used by courts to determine whether or not a healthcare professional was in breach of their duty of care.

In this guide, we will look in greater detail at the duty of care owed by healthcare providers and how this can be breached. Despite this, we expect you may have questions after you’ve finished reading this guide.

trust-pilot logo ratting 4.8 (466 reviews)
We're No Win No Fee SolicitorsTrusted by thousands to win compensation.

If this is the case, you can call our team. They can provide further clarification on anything you may be unsure of. Please get in touch on the details below:

  • Call us on 0800 073 8804
  • Chat with an advisor through the live chat box below
  • An advisor can contact you at your chosen time; just fill out the contact us form

Medical professionals having a conversation about a Bolam test case.

Select A Section

  1. What Is The Bolam Test Case?
  2. Medical Practitioners Duty Of Care
  3. How Does The Bolam Test Case Apply To Instances Of Negligence?
  4. Is The Bolam Test Always Applicable?
  5. The Limits Of Informed Consent
  6. Errors In Diagnosing A Condition
  7. Calculate Compensation For A Breach Of Medical Duty Of Care
  8. Special Damages
  9. Claiming For Medical Negligence With A No Win No Fee Solicitor

What Is The Bolam Test Case?

In medical negligence claims, the Bolam test is where a panel of medical professionals present their opinion on whether one of their peers acted within the standard of their profession. The panel is made up of healthcare providers who are trained in a similar field and who have knowledge on the appropriate standard of care required.

Within the Bolam test, the correct standard of care is a matter of medical judgement. For that reason, medical professionals within a similar field to the defendant doctor or healthcare professional will be called upon.

They look at a case and confirm whether the level of care administered was of an acceptable standard. If they find that the defendant doctor provided the right level of care, then no negligence will be said to have occurred.

Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957]

The Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] WLR 582 is a case between a patient and mental health facility. The patient voluntarily underwent electro-conclusive therapy (ECT). However, before the therapy, the doctor didn’t give him muscle relaxants to prevent muscle contractions or spasms, despite knowing that these can occur as a result of ECT and have a risk of causing fractures.

The patient suffered serious injuries, including a fractured hip joint, for which he claimed compensation. He claimed negligence for not being:

  • Given the muscle relaxant
  • Given any restraints
  • Informed of the risks

However, the decision was in favour of the hospital, as the Court found the doctor had followed normal practice. The normal practice did not involve giving patients muscle relaxants or providing restraints. Therefore, the Court held that he provided the correct standard of care in relation to that form of treatment.

Medical Practitioners Duty Of Care

Every healthcare professional owes their patients the correct standard of care. They should also be open and honest when dealing with patients regarding their treatments. The following sections will look at these responsibilities in more detail.

What Is A Duty Of Care?

In accordance with the General Medical Council (GMC), doctors are required to provide the correct standard of care to all of their patients. This includes things like:

  • Making their patient’s care their first concern
  • Being competent and keeping their professional knowledge and skills up to date
  • Taking prompt action if the safety of their patient is compromised
  • Being open, honest and acting with integrity

Failing to do so could result in a patient suffering avoidable harm through negligence.

What Is A Duty Of Candour?

In addition to providing the correct standard of care, medical professionals should act with candour when dealing with their patients. According to the GMC, this includes:

  • Being open and honest with patients when something goes wrong with the treatment
  • Apologising to the patient or person advocating for the patient
  • Offering an appropriate solution to correct things
  • Fully explaining the short and long term effects of the situation

If you would like to know more about the responsibilities that a healthcare provider owes to you, why not speak to a member of our team today? One of our advisors could offer you a free, no-obligation valuation of your claim.

How Does The Bolam Test Case Apply To Instances Of Negligence?

When there is a need for the Bolam Test in medical negligence claims, its aim is to highlight where negligent care occurred. For example:

  • If a GP missed a fracture because they did not listen to a patient explain how much it hurt and did not refer them for an X-ray, a panel may find that their care fell short of the expected standard.
  • A panel of pharmacy experts may deem a pharmacy technician’s care as substandard if dispensing errors were caused by not paying attention and mixing up the labels on medication.
  • If unnecessary surgery was the result of a surgeon attempting a risky procedure without getting consent or discussing the risks with the patient, the Bolam Test may conclude that they fell short of the expected professional standards.

The test can be called for when it is judged that an expert opinion from within the medical profession would be relevant and useful. It is equally possible to see a request for a Bolam Test in NHS or private practice cases.

However, it is not always required in medical negligence claims. You can learn more about how and when the Bolam Test is applied by calling our advisors for guidance.

Is The Bolam Test Always Applicable?

The Bolam test was used in the case of Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985). This case involved a woman who was offered surgery for back and neck pain. However, the doctor didn’t inform her of the 1-2% risk of paralysis that the procedure carried.

She underwent the procedure and suffered paralysis. This led to her making a claim on the grounds that, had the doctor told her the risks, she wouldn’t have consented to the surgery. However, the judge ruled in favour of the doctor after applying the Bolam test.

It provided expert evidence from a responsible body of neurosurgeons that not disclosing risks with a percentage this low was normal practice.

An argument was made for informed consent but was rejected on the basis that the Bolam test should always be applied when considering whether a doctor was negligent. The judge ruled that medical negligence should be decided based on expert medical evidence from a panel of medical professionals in the same field.

In the next section, we will look in greater detail at the role played by informed consent in medical negligence cases that use the Bolam test.

The Limits Of Informed Consent

The Human Rights Act 1998 gave individuals in the UK recognised autonomy over their own bodies. Informed consent says that a person must be given all of the information about what their treatment involves. This includes:

  • Benefits or risks
  • Alternatives to the treatment suggested
  • What will happen if they opt to have the treatment

However, it has been argued that there are limits to informed consent. For instance:

  • It can be difficult to explain all the risks to patients in a way they will understand
  • A patient may not understand the extent of their condition or treatment suggested to them

It can be argued that patients can’t fully consent to something if they don’t have a full understanding. Because of the existence of factors like those listed above, it may be difficult for healthcare providers to obtain informed consent from their patients in all circumstances.

Errors In Diagnosing A Condition

There have been a few cases involving misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis where the Bolam test has been found to have limitations. In particular, the Muller v King’s College Hospital NHS Trust [2017] QB 987 case.

This involved a histopathologist who failed to diagnose a malignant melanoma. Eventually, the correct diagnosis was given but the delay meant cancer had spread and the patient needed more extensive treatment.

The NHS Trust used the Bolam test argument to show that the misdiagnosis wasn’t through negligence. They stated that any histopathologist acting with reasonable care and skill could have made the same mistake.

However, Muller argued against the use of the Bolam test in this particular circumstance. They argued that in cases of “pure” diagnosis, there is limited scope for a difference in opinion. For instance, when a scan is performed to diagnose the condition, the interpretation of the results are either right or wrong.

In “treatment” diagnosis, however, a doctor might recommend a certain course of treatment or further diagnostic test, and a range of these may be considered reasonable.

In the end, the judge used the Bolam test but considered the limitations when looking at negligence in cases involving pure diagnosis.

Calculate Compensation For A Breach Of Medical Duty Of Care

When putting forward a claim for medical negligence, either against the NHS or a private practitioner, you’re entitled to claim compensation for your physical and emotional suffering. This can be claimed under general damages. The extent of your injuries will be considered, including how severe they are and how badly they have impacted your quality of life.

The table below looks at some of the different injuries you could have suffered due to medical negligence and how much you could claim for them. The figures have been taken from the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG), which is a document that can be used by legal professionals to help value claims. This excludes the top row. That figure is not from the JCG but included to show you how compensation could be awarded for multiple illnesses and injuries plus incurred costs.

Harm sufferedAdditional detailsCompensation award
Multiple Forms of Serious Harm Plus Financial LossSevereUp to £1,000,000+
Brain DamageVery Severe£344,150 to £493,000
KidneyBoth kidneys lost or permanently damaged£206,730 to £256,780
One kidney lost£37,550 to £54,760
BowelDouble incontinenceUp to £224,790
Female reproductive systemInfertility with sexual dysfunction£140,21 to £207,260
Male reproductive systemTotal loss of reproductive organsIn excess of £187,790
Lung DiseaseLung cancer£85,460 to £118,790
BladderSerious impairment of control£78,080 to £97,540
HerniaContinuing pain after repair£18,180 to £29,490

As part of your claim, you will usually be invited to an independent medical assessment. Here, a medical expert will assess your injuries. They’ll then provide a medical report that details the extent of the harm you’ve suffered, which will be used to help value your claim.

For more information on how your claim may be calculated, get in touch with our team using the number at the top of the page.

Special Damages

We understand that when you’ve suffered injury or a worsening of your condition, it can impact your ability to work or take care of yourself. It may also mean that you incur costs that you would not have done if you hadn’t been injured or made ill. For this reason, you’re entitled to claim compensation for these additional costs incurred. The part of your settlement that covers these costs is called special damages.

Special damages might include the following:

  • Loss of earnings
  • Cost of care for yourself or for someone else dependant on you
  • Travel expenses
  • Additional medical care such as physiotherapy or counselling

However, you will need evidence in support of your claim for special damages such as:

  • Receipts for care costs or additional medical care
  • Payslips for loss of earnings
  • Invoices for any services you’ve required

If you aren’t able to provide evidence of the costs you have incurred, you may find it difficult to claim back the full amount of the special damages you’re owed.

Claiming For Medical Negligence With A No Win No Fee Solicitor

Now that you have read some key facts on Bolam test medical negligence, you may be wondering what legal fees could apply when working with our solicitors. We understand that complicated fees can cause concerns for people seeking legal representation. This is why our lawyers operate on a No Win No Fee basis.

This means that, through a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA), there is no requirement to pay for your solicitor’s work:

  • Before your medical negligence claim begins
  • While the claim is underway
  • If your claim is unsuccessful

However, if your claim is recognised and you receive a compensation award, you will need to pay a success fee. This is a percentage of the compensation that you pay to your solicitor. There is a legally binding cap in place to ensure that you keep the majority of the award.

If eligible, you could also benefit from the following services offered by our experienced solicitors:

  • Contacting specialists who could assist with your recovery, such as an expert physiotherapist
  • Helping you to gather the evidence that would strengthen your claim
  • Arguing for your compensation to cover both the financial and physical suffering that you have endured
  • Handling communication with the defendant on your behalf

Please contact our advisors to assess your eligibility to start a medical negligence claim with Legal Expert. They can also answer questions you may have about how a Bolam test case works.

Speak To An Expert

We understand that we have covered a lot of information so if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with our team.

They are available 24/7 to either answer your questions or determine whether the claim you hold is valid. So, why not contact us on any of the following:

  • Call us on 0800 073 8804
  • Chat with an advisor through the live chat box below
  • An advisor can contact you at your chosen time, just fill out the contact us form

Useful Resources

See our guide for information on claiming compensation for a birth injury.

For further details on how to claim compensation, see our guide.

Visit NHS Resolution to see the role they play in claims made against the NHS.

See the NHS website for guidance on raising a complaint.

We hope you found our guide exploring the Bolam test case in relation to medical negligence claims useful. Thank you for taking the time to read.

Client Testimonials

Latest Trustpilot And Google Reviews

legal expert trustpilot reviews

Cannot recommend enough

The level of professionalism and yet friendliness from Karen was unreal, she was fantastic from start to finish. Cannot recommend these guys enough.

Katie Knowler-Eccott

legal expert trustpilot reviews

Highly recommend using this company

Thank you JF Law and especially Jane for taking my case on and for all the comms throughout the time taken to receive any sort of response from the other party involved. Acceptable outcome to case and fee for their hard work is very reasonable. Highly recommend using this company.

Andy McBride

legal expert trustpilot reviews

Exceptional Service

JF Law delivered exceptional service in handling my personal injury claim, specifically under their 'no win, no fee' arrangement. My experience was positive from start to finish, thanks to Karen, who demonstrated remarkable professionalism and care throughout the process.

Ms H

legal expert trustpilot reviews

Legal Advice You Can Trust

I highly recommend JF Law because they are not only honest and trustworthy legal professionals, but also prioritise their clients' best interests with genuine care and professionalism.

Rose

legal expert google reviews

Great Service, Dog bite attack, No win no fee

Great communication with the solicitor and reception staff. Understanding and helpful with my case from 2022 to 2023 . Very knowledgeable team and my case was won . Highly recommend!

Matt

Call For Free
Legal Expert
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.